What Attachment Taught Me About Context

By Jack Higgins · 29 August 2026

Sometimes the strongest feelings make more sense when you can see the context around them.

Understanding Attachment

A while ago, I was seeing someone I felt strongly drawn to.

It did not end particularly well. She simply did not feel the same way I did.

Afterwards, I kept wondering why the connection had felt so intense when, looking back, we had not actually spent enough time together to build the kind of relationship I thought we had.

She lived about an hour away, so seeing each other always required planning. There was anticipation around every meeting. In a strange way, going to see her sometimes felt like a small quest.

Because we did not see each other constantly, the moments we did share felt unusually important. Conversations could be limited, but when we connected, it felt magic.

And because those moments felt rare, I think I gave them more weight.

At the time, I interpreted that feeling as proof of a deep connection.

Looking back, I think distance, scarcity and anticipation all played a role in how attached I became.

The feelings were real. I just did not fully understand what was creating them.

DISTANCE
Seeing each other required effort
ANTICIPATION
Each meeting felt significant
SCARCITY
Rare moments felt more valuable
PERCEIVED CONNECTION
The relationship felt deeper than the time together alone might explain

Looking Inwards

When something does not work out with another person, it is very easy to make them the centre of the entire story.

You start asking questions like:

Why did they do that?

Did they actually like me?

Why did things not work out?

For a while, those were the questions I asked too.

Eventually, though, I started asking a different set of questions.

Why did I become so attached?

Was I attached to the person, or partly to the anticipation of seeing them?

Why did relatively small moments carry so much emotional weight?

Those questions were much more useful.

They shifted the focus away from trying to decode someone else and towards understanding my own behaviour.

That reflection helped me recognise tendencies in myself I had not really examined before.

The difficult part was that I only found those questions after the experience had already ended.

FIRST QUESTION
Why did they do that?
v
BETTER QUESTION
Why did this affect me so strongly?
v
SELF-UNDERSTANDING
The focus shifts from their behaviour to your own patterns

What If You Could Ask Your Past?

This is one of the ideas we are trying to explore with Jorna.

As you log your days, thoughts, habits and experiences, you gradually build a record of the context around your life.

Normally, a journal entry is useful in the moment and then disappears into an archive you may never revisit.

But what if those entries could remain useful later?

What if you could ask a question today and use your own past experiences to help explore it?

“Why do I feel so attached to this person?”

Jorna could look across things I had already captured.

How I felt before seeing her. What I wrote afterwards. Whether similar emotions had appeared in other relationships. Whether certain situations repeatedly created the same kind of anticipation.

None of those things would automatically provide a definitive explanation.

But together, they could give me a much richer view of what was happening.

Not an answer handed to me, but better context for asking the question.

QUESTION TODAY
Why do I feel this way?
PAST THOUGHTS
What you wrote before
PAST EVENTS
What was happening around you
PAST PATTERNS
Where similar feelings appeared
CONTEXT
A clearer view of the pattern

Jorna Should Not Tell You Who You Are

There is an important distinction here.

I do not want Jorna to tell someone exactly why they feel a certain way.

Human behaviour is too complicated for that. A pattern is not automatically a cause, and context is not the same thing as certainty.

The goal is not to outsource reflection.

The goal is to make reflection easier.

If Jorna can help surface a past experience, recurring thought or change in behaviour that you had forgotten about, that may be enough to help you see something differently.

The insight still belongs to you.

Growing Through Confusion

I still would not change the experience.

There is value in not understanding everything immediately.

Some of the most useful reflection only happens after enough time has passed for you to see an experience from a different angle.

In my case, confusion eventually led to better questions. Those questions helped me understand myself in a way I could not at the time.

Jorna is not designed to remove that process.

It is designed to preserve more of the context around it.

As life becomes more complicated, I want to be able to look backwards and see not only what happened, but how I thought, what I felt, what kept repeating and where I changed.

EXPERIENCE
You live through something you do not fully understand
v
TIME
More context becomes visible
v
REFLECTION
You begin asking better questions
v
UNDERSTANDING
The experience becomes part of how you know yourself

If I could give my younger self one thing, it would not be the answers.

I would give him better questions, and eventually a way to look back at his own life for the answers.